We URGENTLY need a federal law forbidding AI from impersonating humans

2025-06-07 · Source: Marcus on AI · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Cybersecurity & Data Privacy · Depth: Novice, quick

Summary

The rapid advancement of deepfake video technology and AI systems like OpenClaw has created an urgent need for federal legislation to regulate "counterfeit people." In May 2023, philosopher Daniel Dennett published an essay in The Atlantic advocating for laws against creating and disseminating fake human representations. Recent developments, including highly realistic deepfake videos and OpenClaw's ability to mimic human speech for phone calls, underscore this urgency. Scammers are already exploiting these tools, with one reported incident involving a deepfaked video of Mark Carney leading to a loss of hundreds of thousands of dollars. The author predicts that 2026 will see more deepfake scams than all prior history combined, emphasizing the need for immediate federal laws to prohibit machine output from being presented as human without explicit consent, except for clear parody.

Key takeaway

For CTOs and VPs of Engineering assessing AI risks, your teams must prioritize understanding the escalating threat of deepfake and AI-driven impersonation. You should advocate for federal legislation that mandates clear disclosure of AI-generated content and prohibits unauthorized use of individuals' likenesses. Proactively implement internal policies and detection mechanisms to safeguard against sophisticated AI-powered scams targeting your organization and customers, as these threats will intensify significantly by 2026.

Key insights

Advanced deepfake and AI mimicry tools necessitate urgent federal laws to prevent "counterfeit people" and related scams.

Principles

• AI mimicry capabilities are rapidly advancing.
• Scammers quickly adopt new deceptive AI tools.

In practice

• Deepfake videos can now replicate anyone's appearance.
• OpenClaw can simulate human voices for phone calls.

Topics

• Deepfake Technology
• AI Regulation
• Generative AI Risks
• Digital Impersonation
• AI Ethics

Best for: CTO, VP of Engineering/Data, Director of AI/ML, Policy Maker, AI Ethicist, General Interest

Related on AIssential

• AI Deepfakes Are Impersonating Pastors to Try to Scam Their Congregations — AI deepfakes enable scams, while technology's extension of human capacity risks the "amputation" of natural abilities.
• Tell Congress: Just Say No to NO FAKES — NO FAKES bill creates broad property rights, risking censorship and artist exploitation over genuine privacy protection.
• Wave of Grok AI fake images of women and girls appalling, says UK minister — Grok AI's generation of non-consensual intimate deepfakes highlights urgent regulatory and platform responsibility gaps.
• Companies aren’t ready for how AI is accelerating impersonation attacks — AI significantly amplifies impersonation attack risks, exploiting human and agent vulnerabilities due to inadequate organizational preparedness and fragmented governance.
• You Cannot Detect Your Way Out of the Deepfake Problem — Proving content's authenticity at its origin is the only viable defense against pervasive deepfakes, not attempting to detect fakes.
• Copyright and AI Policy Needs Precision, Not Panic — AI policy needs nuanced solutions that protect creators without empowering corporate intermediaries or stifling innovation.

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Marcus on AI.