Is your model converging?
Summary
The concept of "model convergence" is often misapplied; instead, the focus should be on whether the inference algorithm is converging. A Bayesian model defines a joint distribution of data and parameters, and conditioning on observed data yields the posterior distribution. Iterative inference algorithms are used for posterior inference, and their convergence depends not only on the model but also on the parameterization and the data, which collectively shape the posterior's geometry. Different parameterizations or datasets can alter this geometry, and various iterative algorithms or their specific configurations can lead to distinct convergence issues. Understanding these dependencies is crucial for accurately diagnosing and addressing convergence problems.
Key takeaway
For research scientists diagnosing issues in Bayesian analysis, you should shift your focus from "model convergence" to "inference algorithm convergence." This more precise terminology correctly highlights that convergence problems are influenced by the model, its parameterization, the data, and the specific algorithm used. When seeking assistance, provide details on all these factors to enable effective troubleshooting of your posterior inference.
Key insights
Inference algorithm convergence, not model convergence, is the accurate focus for Bayesian analysis.
Principles
- Convergence depends on model, parameterization, and data.
- Posterior geometry dictates convergence behavior.
In practice
- Specify parameterization, data, and algorithm for help.
- Distinguish model building from inference algorithm convergence.
Topics
- Inference Algorithm Convergence
- Bayesian Models
- Posterior Distribution
- Model Parameterization
- Iterative Inference
Best for: Research Scientist, AI Scientist, Data Scientist
Related on AIssential
Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science.