Design and missing categories
Summary
The author, a Ghost blog user, frequently forgets to assign categories to blog posts due to the category field's placement within a hidden metadata menu. Unlike a previous system that enforced category selection, Ghost allows publishing without one. The author typically opens the metadata menu only to check the post's URL slug just before publishing, often overlooking the category field. This oversight leads to uncategorized posts, which the author discovers during post-publication checks. The author suggests design improvements such as displaying the category field directly below the post title or implementing a publishing block for uncategorized posts, acknowledging that the issue is minor but highlights how default-invisible fields can be easily forgotten in a streamlined publishing workflow.
Key takeaway
For product managers designing content management systems, consider making critical metadata fields, like categories, visible by default or implementing optional validation rules that prevent publishing without them. Your users' muscle memory and typical workflow can lead to overlooked fields if they are hidden behind menus, even for minor but desired data points. Prioritize discoverability for fields that contribute to content organization and user experience.
Key insights
Hidden or default-invisible fields are easily overlooked, impacting data completeness in content management workflows.
Principles
- Visibility aids completeness
- Workflow impacts field interaction
In practice
- Review field visibility in UIs
- Consider mandatory field enforcement
Topics
- Ghost Platform
- Blog Publishing Workflow
- User Interface Design
- Content Management
- User Experience
Best for: Product Manager, Product Designer, Software Engineer, Creative Technologist
Related on AIssential
Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by James' Coffee Blog.