Security and Privacy of Large Language Models: Threat Taxonomy, Ethical Implications, and…

· Source: LLM on Medium · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Cybersecurity & Data Privacy · Depth: Expert, short

Summary

This paper, a narrative review synthesizing 251 references, addresses the security, privacy, and governance challenges introduced by Large Language Models (LLMs). It proposes a unified lifecycle model for understanding LLM risks, moving beyond traditional software vulnerabilities. Key contributions include a lifecycle-based taxonomy classifying attacks from interaction to training phases, an "alignment gap" framework explaining how pre-training probabilistic behavior conflicts with post-training alignment, and a four-layer socio-technical risk model covering technical, human, organizational, and governance aspects. The review also maps defense-in-depth strategies to various attack categories and lifecycle stages, emphasizing that LLM risks stem from systemic structural factors like probabilistic generation and large-scale data ingestion, rather than isolated code defects. It highlights issues like memorization, bias amplification, PII leakage, and the insufficiency of current regulations.

Key takeaway

For AI Security Engineers and Enterprise Architects deploying Large Language Models, you must move beyond traditional software security models. Your strategy should integrate a lifecycle-oriented defense-in-depth approach, combining technical safeguards like differential privacy and runtime monitoring with robust governance mechanisms. Focus on continuous evaluation and privacy-preserving training to address systemic risks stemming from probabilistic generation and data ingestion, ensuring responsible and secure LLM deployment.

Key insights

LLM risks are systemic, requiring a lifecycle-oriented defense-in-depth strategy across technical, human, organizational, and governance layers.

Principles

Method

The paper proposes a unified lifecycle model for LLM risk analysis, including a lifecycle-based taxonomy, an alignment gap framework, a socio-technical risk model, and defense-in-depth mapping.

In practice

Topics

Best for: Research Scientist, CTO, VP of Engineering/Data, AI Scientist, AI Security Engineer, Policy Maker

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by LLM on Medium.