WaveGraphNet: Physics-Consistent Guided-Wave Damage Localization through Coupled Inverse-Forward Graph Learning

· Source: cs.LG updates on arXiv.org · Field: Science & Research — Engineering & Applied Sciences, Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Data Science & Analytics · Depth: Expert, extended

Summary

WaveGraphNet is a novel coupled inverse–forward graph learning framework designed for guided-wave damage localization in Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) plates. It addresses the challenge of poor generalization to unseen structural regions when training data is limited. The system models the sparse transducer network (e.g., 12 transducers on a 500x500 mm² plate) as a graph, using an inverse branch to predict defect coordinates from spectral descriptors of differential guided-wave responses. A forward branch acts as a physics-consistent regularizer during training, predicting path-wise energy-deviation patterns. Evaluated on the OGW-1 SHM Plate benchmark with spatial hold-out splits, WaveGraphNet achieved the lowest unseen-zone Mean Absolute Error (MAE) (e.g., 0.220±0.027 in Split A, 0.262±0.016 in Split B) and a 0.0% false-positive rate, demonstrating improved robustness in extrapolation compared to non-graph and graph baselines.

Key takeaway

For Machine Learning Engineers developing SHM systems for composite structures, this research highlights that integrating physics-guided forward consistency into graph neural networks significantly improves damage localization in previously unseen regions. You should consider adopting coupled inverse-forward graph learning frameworks to enhance model robustness and reduce false positives (0.0% FPR) when spatial training data is inherently sparse. This approach is crucial for bridging the gap between laboratory performance and reliable field deployment.

Key insights

Coupling inverse graph localization with a physics-consistent forward model improves damage localization extrapolation in unseen regions.

Principles

Method

WaveGraphNet uses a three-stage training: inverse-branch pretraining, forward-branch pretraining, then joint optimization with localization, forward-consistency, and physics-correction losses. Inference uses only the inverse branch.

In practice

Topics

Best for: AI Scientist, Machine Learning Engineer, Research Scientist

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by cs.LG updates on arXiv.org.