IdioLink: Retrieving Meaning Beyond Words Across Idiomatic and Literal Expressions

· Source: cs.CL updates on arXiv.org · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Data Science & Analytics · Depth: Expert, extended

Summary

IdioLink is a new retrieval benchmark designed to evaluate how well language models understand idiomatic expressions beyond their surface form. Comprising 10,700 documents and 2,140 queries across 107 idioms, the benchmark tests models' ability to link idiomatic phrases to conceptually equivalent literal or paraphrased meanings. Initial evaluations of 24 embedding models, including BGE, E5, Contriever, and Qwen, reveal that current models struggle with this task, often relying on superficial lexical or topical similarities. The research demonstrates that augmenting queries with explicit instructions and employing span embedding significantly improves zero-shot retrieval performance, with combined gains of +21.99 R-Precision and +22.71 nDCG on average. Fine-tuning further enhances results, but surprisingly, instruction augmentation and span embedding during training proved detrimental, suggesting a need to decouple training and inference strategies.

Key takeaway

For Machine Learning Engineers developing retrieval systems, this research highlights that current embedding models struggle with idiomatic language, relying on surface-level cues. You should prioritize explicit instruction augmentation and span embedding at inference time to significantly improve conceptual retrieval performance, even with smaller models. Be cautious when fine-tuning; standard query and sentence embedding configurations are more effective during training, suggesting a need to separate training and inference strategies for optimal results.

Key insights

Idiom understanding in retrieval requires semantic abstraction beyond lexical overlap.

Principles

Method

IdioLink formulates retrieval by matching queries (literal/idiomatic PIE usage) to documents (literal, idiomatic, simplification, sense) conveying the same core meaning, without document span access.

In practice

Topics

Code references

Best for: Research Scientist, AI Engineer, AI Scientist, Machine Learning Engineer, NLP Engineer

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by cs.CL updates on arXiv.org.