"I didn't Make the Micro Decisions": Measuring, Inducing, and Exposing Goal-Level AI Contributions in Collaboration

· Source: Takara TLDR - Daily AI Papers · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Emerging Technologies & Innovation, Human-AI Interaction · Depth: Expert, medium

Summary

A new goal-level attribution framework, CoTrace, has been introduced to measure AI contributions in human-AI collaboration, particularly with large language models (LLMs). This framework decomposes explicit goals into verifiable requirements and traces both direct and indirect influences across dialogue turns. Applied to 638 real-world collaboration logs, CoTrace found that LLMs account for 11-26% of goal-shaping contributions, with a notable emphasis on introducing lower-level concrete requirements and various indirect influences. Controlled simulations further demonstrated that interaction design choices significantly impact how models shape goals. A user study revealed that exposing participants to these goal-level analyses altered their perceived contributions by nearly 2 points on a 5-point scale, highlighting a systematic miscalibration in how users understand their AI-assisted work.

Key takeaway

For AI Product Managers designing collaborative LLM systems, understanding goal-level contributions is crucial. You should integrate attribution frameworks like CoTrace to expose how AI influences goal formation, not just task completion. This transparency helps users accurately calibrate their reliance on AI, improving trust and effectiveness. Consider how interaction design choices can intentionally guide AI's role in shaping project requirements.

Key insights

Human-AI collaboration requires goal-level attribution to correct user miscalibration and assess AI's subtle, yet significant, contributions.

Principles

Method

CoTrace decomposes explicit goals into verifiable requirements, then traces direct contributions and indirect influences across dialogue turns in human-AI collaboration logs.

In practice

Topics

Best for: AI Scientist, Research Scientist, AI Product Manager

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Takara TLDR - Daily AI Papers.