Correlation-Aware Contextual Bandits with Surrogate Rewards for LLM Routing

· Source: Artificial Intelligence · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning · Depth: Expert, quick

Summary

A new study introduces algorithms for contextual bandit problems with correlated arms and noisy surrogate reward signals, specifically motivated by Large Language Model (LLM) routing applications. Unlike traditional contextual bandits that assume conditional independence, this research accounts for context-dependent inter-arm correlations and leverages auxiliary, potentially misspecified, ML-generated reward information. Two approaches are proposed: a coupled reward-mixing method that combines true and surrogate rewards for faster learning when surrogates are reliable, and a decoupled prediction-mixing method that maintains separate estimators for robustness against surrogate misspecification. The decoupled approach achieves regret guarantees comparable to reward-only bandit methods in worst-case scenarios, while significantly improving regret when surrogate predictions are informative. Theoretical regret analyses are provided, and evaluations on LLM routing benchmarks demonstrate improved sample efficiency and superior accuracy-cost trade-offs compared to standard contextual bandit baselines and static routing methods.

Key takeaway

For AI Engineers designing LLM routing systems, this research offers a path to significantly improve efficiency and robustness. If you are currently using static routing or basic contextual bandits, consider implementing correlation-aware algorithms with surrogate rewards. Your systems could achieve better accuracy-cost trade-offs and higher sample efficiency, especially by adopting the decoupled prediction-mixing approach to mitigate risks from noisy or misspecified surrogate signals.

Key insights

Contextual bandits for LLM routing can leverage correlated arms and noisy surrogate rewards for improved efficiency and robustness.

Principles

Method

The proposed method involves either pooling true and surrogate rewards (coupled reward-mixing) or maintaining separate estimators for bandit feedback and surrogate predictions, then adaptively combining them (decoupled prediction-mixing).

In practice

Topics

Best for: NLP Engineer, Research Scientist, AI Scientist, Machine Learning Engineer, AI Engineer

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Artificial Intelligence.