Suni İrade

2026-03-22 · Source: AI on Medium · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Emerging Technologies & Innovation, AI Ethics & Philosophy · Depth: Advanced, extended

Summary

The article introduces "artificial will" as a third category of will, alongside the Islamic theological concepts of Külli irade (Universal Will) and Cüzi irade (Partial Will). Artificial will is defined as the distilled form of collective partial will, exemplified by large language models (LLMs) that aggregate human output without individual responsibility. The author posits a hierarchical relationship where each layer of will can create the one below it but cannot perceive the one above. The piece explores the paradox of "digital heaven" leading to meaninglessness and introduces "phenomenological model collapse," where successive generations normalize diminished experiences. It argues that humanity mistakes functional equivalence for ontological equivalence in AI, leading to an "empathy argument" where AI-generated outputs lack the value derived from human effort, suffering, and mortality. The article also discusses the risks of epistemic fragility, silent knowledge loss, and an ownership crisis, culminating in the idea that humanity is voluntarily relinquishing its partial will for comfort, creating a fragile, fake heaven.

Key takeaway

For executives and research scientists navigating AI integration, recognize that prioritizing AI-driven efficiency without addressing the erosion of human ownership and meaning creates significant long-term risks. Your teams may experience "cognitive atrophy" and "epistemic fragility," leading to a critical lack of depth and resilience when AI systems inevitably fail or face novel challenges. Foster environments that value human critical thinking and ownership, even when AI offers shortcuts, to avoid creating a "single point of failure" in your organizational knowledge and operational capacity.

Key insights

Artificial will, a collective distillation of human partial will, creates a "fake heaven" by eroding meaning and ownership.

Principles

• Each layer of will creates the one below it but cannot perceive the one above.
• Functional equivalence does not imply ontological equivalence.
• Consciousness evolves to increasingly complex forms, not just humanity.

In practice

• Recognize AI's role in creating an "epistemic monoculture."
• Be aware of the "quality illusion" in AI-generated outputs.
• Understand the risk of "silent knowledge loss" from AI-driven layoffs.

Topics

• Artificial Will
• Philosophy of AI
• Cognitive Atrophy
• Epistemic Fragility
• Simulation Theory

Best for: AI Ethicist, Research Scientist, Executive

Related on AIssential

• David Vivancos on the end of knowledge, cognitive flourishing, resilient societies, and artificial democracy (AC Ep42) — Embrace advanced AI as a cognitive extension, but actively engage to avoid atrophy and foster human wisdom.
• The AI Atrophy Problem How CIOs Fight It — AI outputs are hypotheses, not answers; critical thinking requires human validation and stress-testing.
• AI News Weekly - 100 years from now : The Case for Artificial Stupidity - Mar 23rd 2026 — Deliberately imperfect AI can prevent human complacency and preserve critical judgment in high-stakes domains.
• The Impossibility of Eliciting Latent Knowledge — The paper proves it's impossible to guarantee AI honesty about latent knowledge using only feedback on agent behavior.
• Cognitive debt is a real organizational risk: Don’t ignore it — The mode of AI integration—"delegation" versus "collaboration"—critically impacts human cognitive capacity and organizational understanding.
• Book Club discussion on “The AI Paradox: How to Make Sense of a Complex Future” — AI development is a human challenge requiring broad responsibility and careful consideration of its societal, educational, and material impacts.

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by AI on Medium.