Cognitive Effects and Biases in Large Language Models

2026-03-19 · Source: Paper Index on ACL Anthology · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning · Depth: Intermediate, quick

Summary

The tutorial "Cognitive Effects and Biases in Large Language Models" by Markus Schedl et al., presented at the 19th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL) in March 2026, explores the intersection of psychology and Natural Language Processing (NLP). It aims to clarify cognitive effects and biases observed in large language models (LLMs). The tutorial compares methodological assumptions across both disciplines and addresses practical challenges in evaluating these phenomena. It also discusses open research directions within this interdisciplinary field, providing insights into the complex interactions between human cognition and AI model behavior.

Key takeaway

For AI Researchers and NLP Engineers working on robust and fair LLMs, understanding the cognitive effects and biases discussed in this tutorial is crucial. You should integrate psychological perspectives into your model evaluation processes to identify and mitigate biases effectively. This approach will enhance the reliability and ethical performance of your language models, leading to more trustworthy AI applications.

Key insights

This tutorial clarifies cognitive effects and biases in LLMs by bridging psychology and NLP.

Principles

• Interdisciplinary comparison clarifies LLM biases.
• Methodological assumptions impact bias evaluation.

In practice

• Evaluate LLM biases using psychological frameworks.
• Address evaluation challenges in bias assessment.

Topics

• Large Language Models
• Cognitive Biases
• Natural Language Processing
• Psychology
• Model Evaluation

Best for: AI Researcher, NLP Engineer, AI Student

Related on AIssential

• Analysis of the Neglect-Zero Effect in Large Language Models — LLMs may not share the human "neglect-zero effect" cognitive bias regarding empty sets.
• Study: AI chatbots provide less-accurate information to vulnerable users — AI chatbots underperform for vulnerable users, providing less accurate information and exhibiting biased behaviors.
• Exposing biases, moods, personalities, and abstract concepts hidden in large language models — A new method can identify and manipulate abstract concepts hidden within large language models to enhance or minimize their expression.
• Occupational Prompting Reveals Cultural Bias in Large Language Models — Occupational prompts elicit structured cultural value patterns in LLMs, even within a Western-leaning default.
• Are we getting better at explaining things because of our interaction with LLMs? — Crafting clear LLM prompts may enhance human explanatory and communication abilities.
• AMEL: Accumulated Message Effects on LLM Judgments — Large language model judgments are significantly biased by the polarity of prior conversation history.

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Paper Index on ACL Anthology.