Auto-DSM Under the Lens: A Black-Box Evaluation Framework for LLM-Based DSM Generation
Summary
A new black-box evaluation framework systematically assesses Large Language Models' (LLMs) capability to generate Design Structure Matrices (DSMs) from structured technical documentation. This framework benchmarks generated DSMs (GEN-DSMs) against manually validated ground-truth matrices (GT-DSMs) using a reproducible methodology. It integrates structural metrics (Completeness, Correctness, Coupling Density), classification metrics (Selective Accuracy, Abstention Coverage), and stability measures (Entropy, Fleiss' κ), synthesizing them into a Composite Quality Score (Q). Controlled experiments on a fictive abstract system and a real-world refrigerator decomposition revealed that LLMs can produce structurally plausible DSMs with high reproducibility under well-structured inputs. However, LLMs remain sensitive to ambiguity, inconsistent dependency definitions, and prompt formulation, leading to systematic hallucination and abstention failures. The framework offers a transparent benchmark for auditing Auto-DSM pipelines and lays groundwork for integrating LLM-based decomposition into model-based systems engineering (MBSE) workflows.
Key takeaway
For AI Engineers evaluating LLM-based system decomposition, you should rigorously benchmark Auto-DSM pipelines using a comprehensive framework like the one proposed. Recognize that while LLMs can generate plausible DSMs from well-structured inputs, their sensitivity to ambiguity and prompt variations necessitates careful input curation. Prioritize clear dependency definitions and structured documentation to mitigate hallucination and abstention failures, ensuring reliable integration into MBSE workflows.
Key insights
A black-box framework evaluates LLM-generated Design Structure Matrices (DSMs), revealing potential and limitations in automation for model-based systems engineering.
Principles
- LLMs generate plausible DSMs from structured inputs.
- Ambiguity and prompt formulation impact LLM DSM accuracy.
- Reproducibility is high with well-defined inputs.
Method
The framework benchmarks LLM-generated DSMs against ground-truth matrices using structural, classification, and stability metrics, synthesized into a Composite Quality Score (Q).
In practice
- Audit Auto-DSM pipelines with the proposed framework.
- Integrate LLM-based decomposition into MBSE workflows.
- Identify sources of LLM hallucination in DSM generation.
Topics
- LLM Evaluation
- Design Structure Matrices
- Model-Based Systems Engineering
- Auto-DSM
- System Decomposition
- LLM Hallucination
Best for: Research Scientist, AI Scientist, Machine Learning Engineer, AI Engineer
Related on AIssential
Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Takara TLDR - Daily AI Papers.