Auto-DSM Under the Lens: A Black-Box Evaluation Framework for LLM-Based DSM Generation

· Source: Takara TLDR - Daily AI Papers · Field: Technology & Digital — Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, Software Development & Engineering · Depth: Advanced, quick

Summary

A new black-box evaluation framework systematically assesses Large Language Models' (LLMs) capability to generate Design Structure Matrices (DSMs) from structured technical documentation. This framework benchmarks generated DSMs (GEN-DSMs) against manually validated ground-truth matrices (GT-DSMs) using a reproducible methodology. It integrates structural metrics (Completeness, Correctness, Coupling Density), classification metrics (Selective Accuracy, Abstention Coverage), and stability measures (Entropy, Fleiss' κ), synthesizing them into a Composite Quality Score (Q). Controlled experiments on a fictive abstract system and a real-world refrigerator decomposition revealed that LLMs can produce structurally plausible DSMs with high reproducibility under well-structured inputs. However, LLMs remain sensitive to ambiguity, inconsistent dependency definitions, and prompt formulation, leading to systematic hallucination and abstention failures. The framework offers a transparent benchmark for auditing Auto-DSM pipelines and lays groundwork for integrating LLM-based decomposition into model-based systems engineering (MBSE) workflows.

Key takeaway

For AI Engineers evaluating LLM-based system decomposition, you should rigorously benchmark Auto-DSM pipelines using a comprehensive framework like the one proposed. Recognize that while LLMs can generate plausible DSMs from well-structured inputs, their sensitivity to ambiguity and prompt variations necessitates careful input curation. Prioritize clear dependency definitions and structured documentation to mitigate hallucination and abstention failures, ensuring reliable integration into MBSE workflows.

Key insights

A black-box framework evaluates LLM-generated Design Structure Matrices (DSMs), revealing potential and limitations in automation for model-based systems engineering.

Principles

Method

The framework benchmarks LLM-generated DSMs against ground-truth matrices using structural, classification, and stability metrics, synthesized into a Composite Quality Score (Q).

In practice

Topics

Best for: Research Scientist, AI Scientist, Machine Learning Engineer, AI Engineer

Related on AIssential

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by Takara TLDR - Daily AI Papers.