Developer withdraws plans for Perth datacentre after fierce community opposition

2026-05-15 · Source: AI (artificial intelligence) | The Guardian · Field: Technology & Digital — Cloud Computing & IT Infrastructure, Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning · Depth: Fundamental Awareness, quick

Summary

GreenSquare has withdrawn its plans for a 15,000 sq meter, three-storey, 120-megawatt datacentre in Hazelmere, near Perth, Australia, following significant community opposition. The proposed facility, intended to power cloud computing and AI acceleration, faced nearly 1,900 public submissions during a City of Swan council review. Council staff recommended rejecting the proposal, citing concerns that noise from diesel generators during power outages would exceed allowable daytime and night-time levels, impacting a nearby school and residents. GreenSquare's CEO, Charles Penny, expressed disappointment, arguing the focus on emergency noise levels creates uncertainty for future digital infrastructure investment in Western Australia. Community groups, including the Bibbul Ngarma Aboriginal Association, highlighted the site's proximity to the Helena River, a conservation wetland, two Aboriginal heritage sites, a primary school, and private residences as inappropriate.

Key takeaway

For executives planning large-scale infrastructure projects, especially datacenters, you must prioritize comprehensive site suitability assessments that include environmental, cultural, and community impact. Ignoring local concerns or relying solely on industrial zoning can lead to project withdrawal and significant financial losses. Ensure your planning frameworks are balanced and reflect operational realities while addressing community expectations for appropriate siting.

Key insights

Community opposition and environmental concerns can halt major infrastructure projects like datacenters.

Principles

• Site appropriateness is paramount for large-scale developments.
• Community engagement impacts project viability.

In practice

• Assess environmental and cultural impact early.
• Engage local communities proactively.

Topics

• Datacentre Development
• Community Opposition
• Aboriginal Heritage Sites
• Noise Regulations
• Hazelmere

Best for: CTO, VP of Engineering/Data, Executive, Policy Maker, Consultant

Related on AIssential

• Under a cloud: the growing resentment against the massive datacentres sprouting across Australian cities — Rapid datacentre expansion in Australia faces significant community backlash over environmental and social impacts.
• "We pissed off a lot of people": Giant data center plan cut 50% amid protests — Intense public backlash over environmental concerns is forcing data center developers to significantly scale back projects.
• How the fight over US datacenters is scrambling this state’s politics: ‘We don’t want it’ — Rapid AI datacenter expansion faces widespread community and political resistance over environmental and social impacts.
• When it comes to total water use, AI data centers are a drop in the bucket — AI data center water use is globally minor but locally significant, prompting corporate stewardship.
• North Star Data Center Policy Toolkit: State and Local Policy Interventions to Stop Rampant AI Data Center Expansion — The toolkit provides policy options to mitigate the negative community impacts of hyperscale data center development.
• Tech conglomerates and infrastructure developers employ sophisticated legal, technical, and administrative maneuvers to bypass environmental protections and public oversight. — Data center developers exploit regulatory loopholes to bypass environmental and planning oversight, creating significant resource strain.

Open in AIssential →

Editorial summary, takeaway, and curation by AIssential. Original article published by AI (artificial intelligence) | The Guardian.