Automate this workflow, or redesign it before we automate?

While 53.7% of organizations automate existing workflows for quick wins, 57.6% of successful AI companies prioritize redesigning work, finding that bolting tools onto old workflows is the leading cause of AI pilot failures.

· Counsel verdict · AIssential

The question

We have a costly manual workflow and pressure to apply AI to it. Do we automate the process as it exists today to show a quick return, or redesign the process first and automate the redesigned version — accepting a longer path to value?

Counsel's position

Redesign the workflow first, then automate it, to achieve significant, sustainable AI-driven value and efficiency.

Verdict

The verdict: Redesign the workflow first, then automate it, to achieve significant, sustainable AI-driven value and efficiency.

57.6% of successful AI companies prioritize workflow redesign over automation

Given your pressure to show a return, redesigning the process rather than just automating it breaks through the ROI ceiling.

Reimagining workflows drives real ROI while basic automation only saves time

Given your choice between quick automation and redesign, bolting AI onto a legacy process fails to transform the underlying workflow.

AI value requires redesigning end-to-end processes rather than isolated tasks

Given your pressure to apply AI, deploying tools without updating the underlying workflow leaves critical intelligence undocumented and scattered.

Workflow redesign is the strongest factor for measurable AI business impact

Given your goal of a quick return, local time savings from basic automation are often absorbed by existing process bottlenecks.

AI workflow redesign is the primary source of enterprise ROI

Given your pressure to apply AI, bolting tools onto old workflows is the leading cause of AI pilot failures.

Read another verdict

Get Counsel for your own decisions →